A Triple Legal Treat For Uber

Martin Romjue
Posted on May 15, 2015

We would all agree we live in a litigious society with far too many lawsuits. They clog our court systems with parties quibbling about every possible offense or circumstance.

If you attract one suit after another, however, regarding multiple, unconnected disputes, then maybe the plaintiffs are on to something.

Such is the case with Uber. While a $40 billion (or is it now $50 billion?) capitalized company will attract its share of malcontents and money-grubbers, Uber seems to get it from all sides.

Three recent suits are working their way through the system:

  1. As reported before, drivers are suing Uber and Lyft in class actions over alleged misclassification as independent contractors. They contend they were treated as employees, while compensated like contractors. In fact, the attorney handling the cases for the plaintiffs, Shannon Liss-Reardon, will speak in just a few days at our Leadership Summit in Miami Beach. Article here
  2. A federal judge in San Francisco has allowed a civil lawsuit filed against Uber by an advocacy group for the blind to proceed. The National Federation of the Blind of California and one individual plaintiff allege that the quasi-taxi company violates the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), along with other state disabilities laws. Article here
  3. And a San Franicsco entrepreneur and former tech buddy of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick cotends in a lawsuit that Uber ripped off its wildly successful idea from his company, Celluride Wireless. Article here

Those are just the primary civil cases so far. Uber is besieged with criminal conduct complaints about its drivers, which has become so common as to qualify as a recurring news theme, i.e. freeway chase, tornado in a trailer park, shark sighting, etc., etc.

Judges and juries will need to decide the merits and culpubability in each of these cases. What we do know is that Uber has been one of the worst corporate citizens to emerge in recent decades. Its very persona, attitude, and public image bleeds with false charm and Freudian slips. Uber's evolution will be an informative case study in public relations seminars for years to come, on what NOT to do.

Uber reminds me of the kid who always gets into fights and then over-explains each one. Is it really just being attacked and victimized? Or does it provoke defensive and justified hitbacks?

Far be it for me to second-guess any jury. But I hope our legal system through these suits will affirm the following, whether plaintiffs win or lose:

1) If you treat someone like an employee, then pay them like one.

2) Blind people deserve the same mobility accesses as those of us who can see.

3) If you create or originate an applied idea in the business world, it belongs to you.

Related Topics: criminal incidents, driver behavior, Editor's Edge Blog, employee vs independent contractor, lawsuits, LCT editor, Legal Issues, Martin Romjue, Shannon Liss-Riordan, TNCs, Uber

Martin Romjue Editor
Comments ( 3 )
  • See all comments
  • Thomas Eide

     | about 5 years ago

    You ARE the reason this litigation exists. You believe popular opinion warrants legitimacy in the same article you state that we are too litigious a society. 1) Uber drivers aren't employees. If they don't turn on that app, their not fired. 2) Blind people also choose to use Uber or not. In fact, I can see 10x the benefits for persons with disabilities to use Uber over ADA-compliant cabs. 3) 1,000s of people came up with the Uber idea long before Uber. Do they all deserve to own a piece? There are two types of people in the world. I earned it or I deserve it. The "I deserve its" run to their attorneys while the "I earned its" read your ignorant blog, shake their heads and go earn it again today.

More Stories