
California Operators Close Out A Breakthrough Year
The Greater California Livery Association’s annual holiday event took on a more festive tone as the industry stands to benefit from measures that will ease business operations.
![]() |
![]() |
COMMENTARY: What if a state regulator or enforcement officer showed up at your business, eyeballed your fleet, and told you every one of your stretch limousines (120 in. or less) had to be retrofitted with push-out windows or roof hatches by Jan. 1, 2016? And if you don’t, then you have to buy new limousines that have fifth doors or the approved pop-out windows? No problem, right? It’s just another way to ensure public safety, right?
Well, California operators are facing this dilemma, which is one of the most absurd and unjust spectacles to hit the limousine industry in years. Legislation requiring such emergency exit retrofits, called SB 109, was approved in the state legislature in September. Gov. Jerry Brown signed it on Oct. 11, despite the fact that the group representing the interests of California operators, the Greater California Livery Association (GCLA), wrote a letter to Brown explaining why the facts supported a veto.
SB109 was sponsored by Sen. Ellen Corbett, a Democrat from the San Francisco Bay Area who serves as the Majority Leader. Corbett proposed her bill in response to the fatal stretch limousine fire of May 4 in which five women burned to death on the San Mateo Bridge while celebrating a bachelorette outing. But Corbett advanced the bill before all the facts were in.
The facts, based on a California Highway Patrol investigation, proved the limousine fire was a one-off catastrophe, not the result of a pattern. A unique set of circumstances, factors and miscues resulted in a horrific outcome. This scenario has not happened before. It’s not a case of exploding Ford Pinto gas tanks that requires safety improvements and new rules.
Clueless.gov
The GCLA did a valiant job trying to inform and negotiate in good faith on SB109. The GCLA and its lobbyists sought to engage Corbett, suggesting compromises and explaining the effects of the bill. The GCLA even agreed that a fifth-door requirement for new stretch limousines was reasonable, since they are easier for groups to get in and out of than four-door models. But retrofitting windows and roofs is structurally complicated or impossible, not to mention costly. It’s also never been done before on such a mass scale. With all the post-recession consolidations and bankruptcies in limousine manufacturing, there simply are not enough qualified builders in California able or willing to retrofit 3,000 plus stretches by the deadline.
That means small, mom-and-pop, Main Street limousine businesses will lose money, either by having to sell or retire their stretches early, buy more expensive new ones, or just forgo the stretch limo niche entirely. There’s also the added effect of spurring illegal activity, as is often the case when people are faced with difficult and stupid rules.
None of those facts, however, dissuaded Corbett from modifying or backing off of her emotional bill. She was not interested in any pragmatic, cost-benefit analysis. The real reason this bill ultimately got passed was not so much about public safety as it was about striking a political pose: Whenever something bad happens a politician somewhere has to be seen doing something supposedly helpful. This situation is especially acute in California, where one political party controls all levels of government, and it’s a party prone to anti-business biases.
The painful lessons for the limousine industry are common to small businesses everywhere. Government can be reasoned with up to a point. But at the end of the day it’s still government — a behemoth with its own interests, motives and appetites. You would think the GCLA’s savvy track record in working with regulators and legislators would earn it some reciprocity and a willingness from government officials to compromise in good faith and reward an industry trying to treat government as a partner. But we are in a political phase defined by “never letting a crisis go to waste” and a “we know better” attitude among elected officials. That adds up to greater government control over businesses and individuals.
Moving On
We should remember that for all of its blundering ineptitude, government is still of, by and for the people, maybe not always in practice but definitely in principle. The small business sector, including the limousine industry, has all the tools at its disposal to organize for political action. Despite all the regulatory and economic challenges of recent years, the sector is still the largest source of jobs in the U.S. That carries a lot of clout.
In the era of social media and the 24/7 media cycle, calling out bad political behavior goes a long way. California operators should start taking some clever pages from activist groups, who are never shy about leveraging free speech, freedom of assembly, and the wheels of the political process. There are thousands of stretch limousine operators nationwide who have every right and every tool to tell business partners, clients, suppliers, friends, colleagues and neighbors to turn up the heat on politicians like Corbett. Elected officials are not invincible and they don’t know more about business than you do. It’s time for the industry to do whatever it legally takes to gum up the gears on SB109. Advocates of the bill are due for a good dose of Constitutional blowback.
Related LCT article: GCLA Responds To Limo Safety Bills
Related Topics: California operators, Greater California Livery Association, industry politics, legislation, limousine fires, limousine manufacturing, limousine safety, passenger safety, state regulations, stretch limousine, West Coast operators
The Greater California Livery Association’s annual holiday event took on a more festive tone as the industry stands to benefit from measures that will ease business operations.
Be careful how your company presents and implements a “Zero Tolerance” policy.
The company and its rivals disrupted ground transport, riding on a lack of regulation. Now, regulators are closing in.
The state association with the heft of a national one will host operators from around California and the nation on Dec. 3.
The Department of Labor reportedly has been trying to get unpaid employment taxes from the TNC going back as far as 2015.
Despite severe damage, rear portions of the passenger compartment remained relatively intact, maintaining space for occupants to survive.
Legislators are looking at a new California law that is receiving pushback from Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash.
Owners believe it’s just another hurdle since they’re already registered with the public service commission and DOT.
The TNCs want voters to give them a break after the historic passing of AB 5.
A newly released report along with court documents provides more details about the accident.
If the City Council approves a proposed $3 tax on solo ridehail trips downtown, the city would top all others in the U.S.
Matt Daus, an expert on ground transportation regulation and technology, will be one of four panelists giving their take on the future of transportation.
Chicago is the only city that requires TNCs to notify regulators within 48 hours of deactivating a driver due to public safety concerns.
The governor signs a safety measure strongly supported by the Greater California Livery Association.
Operator Kevin Barwell points out the stretch involved in last year's fatal crash was nearly 20 years old and technology has changed since then.
The world's No. 1 online marketplace and trader for professional chauffeured and chartered vehicles, including all types of motorcoaches, buses, vans, stretch limousines, sedans, SUVs, exotics, and classics. New and used vehicles are available from sellers across the nation.
The best online networker to find quality affiliates worldwide and market your company.
Click on any state to see the latest industry news and events in that region.
Get the latest news and most popular articles from LCT delivered straight to your inbox.
Current newsletters:
Jeff
| about 6 years agoRight with ya ! These cars need to have the safety and the options for it, no reason anyone needs to get hurt . These options should have been there in the fist place even with a fith door your still trapped if the locks are jammed. More town car limos are on the road more than any other car ,because they were the best car for this industry, and the new stuff just dont cut it where that one left off, with the new laws in effect the governing factor that set them should help kick in a certain percentage to help off set cost along with the manufactures, the association the we pay into should also help. This should not just be the owners responsibility so who do we blame? The manufacture , well yes most of them made busses at one time or another an they have to be equiped with pop out windows an a roof hatch? So this needs to be treated more so like a recall of sorts