Bucking The New Star Treatment

Posted on April 26, 2016 by - Also by this author

While sitting recently in a Marriott Residence Inn pondering how I could write about customer service problems, I opened up my Starbucks app and tapped to check my giant coffee cop full of gold stars. The cup was empty. A prompt said I was all up to date and there were no messages.

I admit I don’t read my Starbucks e-mail, so I rudely became aware of how the coffee house behemoth changed, or downgraded, its rewards program. As a gold card member, I used to get a free “reward” drink or item for every 12 stars earned. A gold star plopped into your app cup every time you bought one item, whether a coffee or a cake pop, regardless of price.

Now, the rewards are based on money spent, with two points for every dollar. Earn 125 points, and you get your reward. That means you pay $62.50 for every freebie. For those of us who spent anywhere from $1.75 to $5.75 on our qualifying 12 coffees, that’s a bad deal. Theoretically, you could buy 12 “tall” drip coffees at $1.75 each, for a total of $21, and then get a venti quad latte worth $5.75 for free.

What’s more, my gold card status now expires next month, instead of May 2017 based on all the stars I had earned under the old reward system.

Again, these are First World problems, but I e-mailed Starbucks, “outraged.” I got a nice form letter in response, detailing the rewards program, stating, “The new Starbucks Rewards is designed to give equal value to all of our members. The new program will reward your frequency AND the products you buy. We understand it may now take some customers longer to earn a Reward.”

Did they really say that? Translation: “We gave you a privilege for years of high frequency loyalty and spending, but now we’re taking a lot if it back, including one year’s worth of gold status.”

It’s pointless to argue with Starbucks. The corporate giant works out all of its P&Ls and market projection data to the finest degree, so I’m sure they see additional profit, or fewer lost revenues. I’m not surprised a downscaled Rewards program comes from a company that now tries to sell mediocre wines at $9 to $11 per glass, and that's just for the less mediocre brands. The finer mediocre brands cost more. 

Clue in the cosmos? Was he the first to see a Starbucks cup full of rewards?
Clue in the cosmos? Was he the first to see a Starbucks cup full of rewards?
Does Starbucks not realize you can likely find a better per-glass deal at multiple restaurants and bars within a three-mile radius in any urban or suburban area? Who would anyone buy a glass of wine at a Starbucks? Two-Buck Chuck smuggled in a used Starbucks cup would be a better deal. I’ve never even seen a glass being consumed at a local one that offers a wine menu. I can’t picture a group of five co-workers enjoying a post 5 p.m. happy hour of wine at $45 to $55 per round. (My God, that’s 90 to 110 stars!)

While Starbucks sees revenue growth, here’s what I saw one day after this discovery: Diagonally across the street from a Starbucks I regularly visit in Los Angeles on weekends, a new Dunkin' Donuts has opened. I look forward to switching from Starbucks brew to the smoother Dunkin’ one and swapping out my cake pops for donuts. Look! Watch me promote their website: DUNKIN' DONUTS

The point here is if you offer your clients rewards, discounts, privileges, benefits, extra amenities and/or perks as part of a continuing arrangement, don’t cheap out and dilute it. At least, clearly state at the beginning it’s a “limited time offer,” with a specific end date. Better yet, keep rewards membership constant.

So if you can’t maintain satisfaction in a long-term customer relationship, then you shouldn’t be pursuing one in the first place. You owe your clients respect, honesty and consistency. Competing providers once dismissed can start looking real good, real fast. Customers get mad when they realize you're just not that into them, and sure as hell won’t want to take your product anymore.

View comments or post a comment on this story. (1 Comment)

More Editor's Edge Blog Posts

November 30, 2016

Populist Peeps On The Rebound

The 2016 election year also marked LCT's own brand of anti-establishment activity.

November 29, 2016

No Sympathy For Passengers With First Class Envy

Air rage among coach class passengers resenting first class occupiers is not rooted in reality.

November 9, 2016

Enough Now: Facebook Hysterics Are Bad For Business

In a nation so evenly split, why do so many fall into the trap of publicly alienating the other 50%?

September 28, 2016

Why So Much Ta-Da, To-Do About Driverless Cars?

Separating hype from human reality will challenge even the smartest driverless technology experts.

September 22, 2016

Looking Like Livery Trash?

The more casual and coarse society gets, the more chauffeured service can gleam with a counter-couture-culture.

See More

Facebook Comments ()

Comments (1)

Post a Comment

Submit

Blogs

See More

See More

See More

See More

LCT Store

LCT Magazine - December 2016 $12.95 GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL ISSUE COVER STORY: * The Coolest Operators on the Planet * *



Connect

Experience the three annual industry events for networking for business, showcasing vehicles and products, and getting the tools for success.

Read About Your Region

What’s Happening Near You?
Click on any state to see the latest industry news and events in that region.

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment

TruckingInfo.com

THE COMMERCIAL TRUCK INDUSTRY’S MOST IN-DEPTH INFORMATION SOURCE

Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Metro Magazine

Serving the bus and passenger rail industries for more than a century

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

Please sign in or register to .    Close