No, it's not! It's a certified pre-owned car. Now you can charge more for it.
I’m going to address a pet-peeve of mine regarding vehicle lingo. It’s the increasing use of “pre-owned” instead of "used" to describe a vehicle that's, well, used. For the last century, since the masses have bought and sold vehicles, a new vehicle has been defined as one bought by a first-time owner-motorist, whereas a used vehicle has been one sold off or traded-in by a first-time owner to be resold on the “used” vehicle market.
Simple enough. NEW. USED. Everyone always understood what those terms meant, and each category of vehicle has its distinct market.
Now comes the vague (vain?) marketing term of “pre-owned,” as applied to USED vehicles. Why the semantical switch?
A pre-owned vehicle is what, exactly? A previously owned vehicle? Or pre-owned as in, eagerly waiting to be owned (again)? And what if it was never owned, just leased? Whether a vehicle is previously owned or leased, it’s still used.
Technically, all vehicles for sale on every lot are "pre-owned." They’re both previously owned and/or waiting for a new owner. Even new cars were once owned by the dealerships. Otherwise, why would you do a title transfer when buying a new car?
Leave it to marketers to muddle up messages and labels in order to obscure the obvious. That’s why we have so much political correctness in our collective language.
This pre-owned linguistic reflex could be applied to all types of situations:
- Is a single man or woman pre-married? Or “pre-viously” married, in the event of a divorce or spousal death?
- Is a young adult a pre-mature adult? Or could an immature older adult be a pre-mature adult, as in he was pre(viously) mature but now plays video games at age 50 and eats pizza out of the box.
- Is a pre-dated woman one who once dated? Is outdated? Never-dated? Dated out of the market? And if she had a no-good-loser boyfriend, does that make her used?
Oh, how I could sow some wild oats of confusion:
“You see, that goody-two-shoes Hobart is not really a virgin, he’s just a pre-sexual.” OR, “Ever since that filthy, lyin’, cheatin’ Hobart turned celibate, he’s been a pre-sexual adult.”
Alright, enough swirling into the gutter; let’s get back to vehicles. I rest my case: The simplest words for vehicle buying status are best: NEW or USED.
Trying to buff up the image of used vehicles by calling them pre-owned seems silly and misleading. As if it somehow changes the sales potential or the quality of the vehicle. Once it’s been owned and driven, it’s been used.
Don't agree with me? Argue with Edmunds.com: "Certified pre-owned vehicles go through multiple-point inspections, but they are still used cars and things will sometimes break."
If vehicle sellers insist on using "pre-owned," then you should know that every issue of LCT Magazine you get has been pre-read. Sorry, but the alternative would be worse, and I wouldn’t be doing my job.
And here’s a stunning revelation that affects us all: Every one of us is pre-conceived.
I hope that’s a new joke. Otherwise, I’ll just own up to being a pre-user.
Separating hype from human reality will challenge even the smartest driverless technology experts.
The more casual and coarse society gets, the more chauffeured service can gleam with a counter-couture-culture.
As the dates for autonomous milestones move up, motorists retain a healthy skepticism of self-driving vehicles.
Opposite sides rage against the ride app machine: When do you consider an app legit?
What happens when the big buses are chauffeured, while more sedans to the airport are driven?