Bells Are Tolling For Illegal Pay Methods

Posted on July 8, 2009 by - Also by this author

AS THE INDUSTRY WATCHES: The Bell Transportation wage saga might be an ideal time to examine your own pay methods before a judge decides what is right and wrong in payroll arrangements — as was the case recently with one of the largest limousine companies in the nation and its employee chauffeurs.
FAIR PAY: It is important to note the word, “employee.” When people perform work for a company, they are either an employee or a contractor. It is very black and white. Methods of compensation are equally black and white, but for some reason, livery operators feel that labor laws designed to protect employees are optional for them.
In the particular case of Las Vegas-based Bell Transportation, there were many issues brought up beyond the failure of Bell to pay overtime and to pay for all hours worked. Some of the issues raised included assessing a fee to a chauffeur for daily car washes, requiring chauffeurs to supply their own napkins, and “fining” drivers for failing to return the car in an immaculate condition.
However, the “fine” was paid to the company and the next chauffeur taking over the “less than perfect” vehicle was forced to make the vehicle right without any compensation as Bell does not pay its employed chauffeurs for prepping a car or even driving to the pickup location or staging location. Instead, it opts to pay them starting with the beginning of the client service.
Everything above is something that might be expected in a contractor relationship where Company A pays Company B, the contractor, a specific amount of money for performing the job. But Company B owns the car, pays for insurance, buys the fuel, and is free to take or refuse any job presented to him. 
In the case of employee chauffeurs, they are taught to do things a certain way and operate vehicles fully owned, insured, and fueled by the company that employs the chauffeur.
Employees cannot be charged for anything other than loss or breakage that occurs as a result of gross negligence. That means if you make them wear a “distinctive uniform,” you must supply it at your expense. If the “uniform” consists of a dark suit and that same dark suit can be worn to church, an employee may supply his  own uniform, according to California labor laws.
In terms of payment, federal law is very specific that employees must be paid “for all hours worked, not less than minimum wage.” It does not say that you can have them come in, pre-trip the car, drive to the location, and then start getting paid — and that this is acceptable because the chauffeur will likely get a tip. Some employers falsely believe that because the chauffeurs are “tipped” that this compensates them for the time spent not driving a client. I suppose that technically you could say that if you paid $8 an hour and the chauffeur did a 4-hour job that had a “built-in,” or as I like to say, a forced tip of $43 that you could take the entire amount of $75 (wages + tip) and divide it by the six hours the employee actually worked and call it $12.50 an hour and be in compliance with minimum wage. 
Except for the fact that the employee’s paycheck is probably going to say that he worked 4 hours and had a $43 gratuity when he really worked 6 hours. According to the law, you technically shorted him two hours of pay.
The bottom line is if an employee drives your vehicle, the time you tell him to get to work and the time he gets to go home is all payable for every single minute on the clock. So the best method for playing the legal game right is to have a time clock. When employees arrive, they punch in. When they go home, they punch out. This concept has worked for almost every industry in America and there is no reason why we should think we are any different.

— Jim Luff, LCT Contributing Editor

View comments or post a comment on this story. (0 Comments)

More LCT Blog Blog Posts

October 1, 2012

Event Management

Don't let your guests down. Here are some things to think about before the event starts.

September 26, 2012

October LCT Mag Focuses On Customer Service

ISSUE PREVIEW: What does he think? What did she really say? Are you channeling your customers? In the October 2012 issue of LCT Magazine, you’ll get a complete primer on how to read and please your
September 26, 2012

Driverless Cars Legalized In California

With no need for people to operate vehicles, how can limo companies adapt to the new world of transportation?
September 26, 2012

Manners Still Matter On Social Media

It has never before been easier for businesses to share information, insight and intimacy with consumers; it has also never been easier to offend them. Read more to learn how to avoid a social media faux pas.
September 20, 2012

My First Encounter With The 2013 Lincoln MKT Town Car

On my trip to Chicago last week for the 2012 BusCon Expo, I had the pleasure of experiencing a new ride — the 2013 MKT Town Car.
See More

Facebook Comments ()

Comments (0)

Post a Comment



See More

See More

See More

See More

LCT Store

LCT Magazine - October 2016 $12.95 COVER STORY: * Leverage Tech To Levitate Your Operations * *


Experience the three annual industry events for networking for business, showcasing vehicles and products, and getting the tools for success.

Read About Your Region

What’s Happening Near You?
Click on any state to see the latest industry news and events in that region.

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher

Automotive Fleet

The Car and truck fleet and leasing management magazine

Business Fleet

managing 10-50 company vehicles

Fleet Financials

Executive vehicle management

Government Fleet

managing public sector vehicles & equipment


Work Truck Magazine

The number 1 resource for vocational truck fleets

Metro Magazine

Serving the bus and passenger rail industries for more than a century

Schoolbus Fleet

Serving school transportation professionals in the U.S. and Canada

Please sign in or register to .    Close